Hunger strike in Cuba
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support to pay for more powerful servers. Thank you.
March 2016
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Translate
EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish
Archives
Recent Comments

    From the Black Spring to a Rolling Stones Concert

    Cuba: From the Black Spring to a Rolling Stones Concert / Iván García
    Posted on March 18, 2016

    Iván García, 16 March 2106 — Around 12 midnight on Tuesday, 18 March
    2003, I was en route to my apartment in the La Víbora neighborhood when,
    from the balcony, some incomprehensible signs coming from my mother set
    off the alarms.

    Those were hard years. My mother and I were contributing articles to
    the independent press agency, Cuba Press, prohibited by the government,
    which was led by the poet and journalist Raúl Rivero. We were detained,
    intimidated or warned by cowboys from State Security with too much
    insistence.

    Fidel Castro, meticulously, had prepared his “crime” scene. Since
    February 1996, when MiG aircraft shot down four civilian aircraft of the
    Brothers to the Rescue, and with the turn of the screw to the embargo on
    the part of Bill Clinton’s administration, the olive-green strongman
    unleashed his furies upon the peaceful opposition.

    In 1999, the obedient and one-note national parliament had approved Law
    88, a legal platform that allowed the government to impose prison terms
    of up to 30 years on dissidents, human rights activists, and independent
    journalists.

    The acts of repudiation conducted on our domiciles were frequent. We
    lived in a climate of fear. But we continued reporting stories about the
    other Cuba, the one that was never reflected in the official press.

    That night, my mother tells me that she had gone to turn in some
    articles to Raúl Rivero at his home in Centro Habana and, no sooner had
    she arrived but Raúl tells her that State Security had been searching
    the homes of Ricardo González Alfonso and Jorge Olivera, and that as
    soon as these searches were over, they would be taken into custody. “He
    said that I should return immediately and tell you,” she recounted,
    “because at any moment, they would come looking for the two of us.”

    Two days later, on Thursday 20 March, Blanca–Raúl’s wife–tells us that
    at around 5 pm, he had been arrested. “The operation was tremendous,”
    she said. “Television cameras, several patrol cars and dozens of police
    officers, as if he were a terrorist. But when the neighbors found out,
    they went out into the street and several of them screamed.”

    Throughout the following hours and days, we learned of other arrests of
    colleagues in the capital and the provinces. Their weapons: typewriters.
    Their crime: to dream of democracy in Cuba.

    I was going around with a toothbrush and a spoon in my backpack. The
    atmosphere was oppressive. Hijackings of commercial airlines and ships
    were taking place. In a summary trial, Fidel Castro ordered the
    execution of three young black men who had hijacked an old passenger
    ferry. It was a state-sponsored execution.

    The regime’s reasoning, taking advantage of the start of the war in
    Iraq, was that the raid would be unnoticed. It was not so. Presidents,
    intellectuals and international media focused on the wave of repression.
    In its prosecutions, the government was requesting the death penalty for
    seven opposition members.

    Years later, Raúl Castro, handpicked as president by Fidel–pressured by
    the fatal hunger strike of the dissident Orlando Zapata Tamayo, and by
    the marches of the Ladies in White demanding the release of their
    husbands, fathers and sons–initiated negotiations to free the government
    opponents, as part of a troika with the Catholic Church and the Spanish
    chancellor Miguel Ángel Moratinos.

    The military autocracy undertook lukewarm economic reforms that were
    indispensable to its continuance in power. The furniture was moved
    around, but the same décor was maintained.

    It was not a gamble on market economics or democracy. No. It was a play
    for survival. They legalized absurd, feudal-style rules that had kept
    Cubans from accessing mobile telephones, hotel lodging, buying cars or
    selling their homes. But structurally, the essence of the regime was–and
    still is–maintained.

    Thirteen years later, in Spring of 2016, you can say whatever you want.
    But you cannot create a political party, an independent association, or
    a print newspaper.

    In the economic sector, the opening is limited. There is no coherent
    legal framework for private entrepreneurs who, lacking a wholesale
    market where they can buy their raw materials and ingredients, must
    resort to trickery, corruption and cooking the books.

    The State continues to classify self-employed workers as presumed
    delinquents. The regime’s economic guidelines–its holy bible–warns that
    the government will not consent to the concentration of capital in
    private hands. The new investments law does not permit investing in the
    self-employed.

    What have been the changes undertaken by the Cuban autocracy? The prime
    transformations have been in foreign policy. Key aspects of Cuban
    diplomacy have undergone a 180-degree turn during Raúl Castro’s term in
    office.

    The Havana regime has gone from training guerrilla groups or terrorists
    in their territory, to negotiating a place in world financial
    mechanisms, to signing new treaties with the United States and the
    European Union, to mediating between the Catholic and Orthodox churches,
    to being an important actor in achieving a peace accord in Colombia.

    Cuba has opened itself to the world, as Pope John Paul II asked, but not
    to Cubans. At the internal level, the aged gerontocracy’s resistance
    continues, with its anachronistic concepts of social control, absence of
    political liberties, and suppression of free expression. In the economic
    area, the reforms are limited and insufficient.

    When Raúl Castro regards his reflection in the mirror, he does not see
    himself as Wojcieh Jaruzelski, the Polish leader who opened the fortress
    to democracy. He would like to be remembered as the man who perpetuated
    his brother Fidel’s “Revolutionary work.”

    It is necessary to prognosticate what Cuba’s future might be. To open a
    Pandora’s box in closed societies is always a dangerous game. And a
    presumed redeemer can turn into a probable gravedigger.

    Perceptions are deceiving. A great red carpet for President Obama, a
    mega-concert by the Rolling Stones, a recent accord with the EU, and the
    imminent signing of a commitment between the FARC and the Colombian
    government to put an end to the continent’s last armed conflict.

    But on the Island, repression of frontline dissidents and arbitrary
    arrests continue–as do low wages, high cost of living and a questionable
    future. This is why many Cubans are opting to emigrate.

    Translated by Alicia Barraqué Ellison

    Source: Cuba: From the Black Spring to a Rolling Stones Concert / Iván
    García | Translating Cuba –
    translatingcuba.com/cuba-from-the-black-spring-to-a-rolling-stones-concert-ivn-garca/

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *